Theories and new investment practices take time to be widely adopted. Capital typically struggles grasping a new concept before flooding the thematic with inflows.
It does not matter if we are talking about index investing, hedge funds, derivatives, credit portfolios or any of the hundreds of investment products available. Adoption takes time. Once the theme or process is widely accepted, performance drives inflows rather than a proof of concept thematic.
The latest thematic to have taken hold is ESG but it too has a long history with the first sustainable mutual fund (Pax World) launched in 1971 (two United Methodist ministers were looking to avoid investing church dollars in companies contributing to the Vietnam War). The uptake took time, by 1994 in the US just 26 sustainable funds were available to investors. The UN Principles for Responsible Investing were written in 2006.
Impact investing had been practiced for decades but the term is now widely accepted to have been created in 2007, followed by the Global Impact Investing Network launched in 2011. The UN Sustainable Development Goals were born at a conference in 2012 and adopted in late 2015.
This time frame from inception to adoption is not unusual; the first hedge fund was founded in the late 1940s, but widespread adoption took decades.
Vanguard’s first index Fund was developed in 1976 and saw extremely limited inflows for years, raising almost no additional capital in its first five years of existence. Flows into sustainable funds surged in 2020 with more than $150 billion in inflows in Q4 alone.
Once an investing thematic is labelled and accepted by investors the question moves from what it is to how a particular firm or manager defines their process.
What is Impact Investing?
Impact investing is a form of investment with the dual intent of generating positive social and environmental impacts together with financial returns. The industry grew by over 40% in 2020.
What is Beckon’s approach to impact investing?
Beckon believes that:
Beckon’s growth equity investment style is particularly suited to this inclusive and hands-on approach to impact.
Beckon targets investment opportunities in businesses that have a deep understanding of the positive effects they have on their broader stakeholders and actively measures those effects. Beckon defines these businesses as ‘Impact Natives’. They integrate impact into their business models, and their success metrics are well aligned to measures of positive impact.
Beckon believes that many other businesses have unrealised impact potential and demonstrate strong impact intentionality. Beckon defines these businesses as ‘Impact Naive’ and chooses to work with them to ignite this latent potential. The Investment Process takes qualifying Impact Naive businesses on a journey to define their impact mission and intended positive outcomes, to identify and strengthen their ESG metrics and to appreciate their total impact footprint, both positive and negative. Beckon calls these transitioning businesses ‘Impact Adopters’.
Beckon’s impact measurement methodology incorporates:
We believe that impact and sustainable investing is established and has entered the growth phase. Investors now need to focus on manager selection and impact mandates. Beckon has launched our impact growth equity fund focussed on Australian SMEs. Contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org for more information.
David (Bushy) Nolan Beckon Capital Pty Limited (ABN 49 628 013 678), authorised representative No. 001280538 of Fundhost Limited (ABN 69 092 517 087, AFSL No. 233045) (“Beckon”)